Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 17:32:36 -0500 From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com> To: AN <andy@neu.net> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome2.x Message-ID: <BANLkTikB8cW%2BkbqeFgqxCrcE5CZVKcEKsQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1105191219140.35252@mail.neu.net> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1105191219140.35252@mail.neu.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:27 AM, AN <andy@neu.net> wrote: > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > To me, GNOME could add OS-level integration and provide clear > delineation as to what is PI and what is PD. =A0The PD stuff should have > open specifications. =A0That's the OSS model. =A0But if the GNOME guys wa= nt > to make GNOME into the Linux OS, that's their call. =A0GNOME 2.x is still > open. =A0Perhaps the fork efforts being discussed will take off. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > What is the status of Gnome2 on FreeBSD? =A0Specifically, will the abilit= y to > run Gnome2 exist in the future? =A0If so, for how long? The GNOME 2 won't be delete. But the users will have to make the choice of GNOME 2 or GNOME 3 as both are conflict to the each others. Cheers, Mezz --=20 mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTikB8cW%2BkbqeFgqxCrcE5CZVKcEKsQ>