Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 May 2011 17:32:36 -0500
From:      Jeremy Messenger <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com>
To:        AN <andy@neu.net>
Cc:        freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Gnome2.x
Message-ID:  <BANLkTikB8cW%2BkbqeFgqxCrcE5CZVKcEKsQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1105191219140.35252@mail.neu.net>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:27 AM, AN <andy@neu.net> wrote:
> Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>
> To me, GNOME could add OS-level integration and provide clear
> delineation as to what is PI and what is PD.  The PD stuff should have
> open specifications.  That's the OSS model.  But if the GNOME guys want
> to make GNOME into the Linux OS, that's their call.  GNOME 2.x is still
> open.  Perhaps the fork efforts being discussed will take off.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What is the status of Gnome2 on FreeBSD?  Specifically, will the ability to
> run Gnome2 exist in the future?  If so, for how long?

The GNOME 2 won't be delete. But the users will have to make the
choice of GNOME 2 or GNOME 3 as both are conflict to the each others.

Cheers,
Mezz


-- 
mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org


help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTikB8cW%2BkbqeFgqxCrcE5CZVKcEKsQ>