Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:29:01 -0500
From:      Eric F Crist <ecrist@secure-computing.net>
To:        pyunyh@gmail.com
Cc:        freebsd-drivers@FreeBSD.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kern/123053
Message-ID:  <9484DE45-E872-4C83-A9F3-CA8A27368CEE@secure-computing.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080425002507.GB62719@cdnetworks.co.kr>
References:  <1F58C85A-CBD3-46A8-9392-0B5994992475@secure-computing.net> <20080425002507.GB62719@cdnetworks.co.kr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 24, 2008, at 7:25 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 05:54:13PM -0500, Eric F Crist wrote:
>> Andrey,
>>
>> I've applied the patch to a 7.0-RELEASE-p1 source tree and rebooted  
>> my
>> system.  The card comes UP ok, but shows the following when connected
>> to a 100BaseT/ Full Duplex switch port:
>>
>
> By chance, are you referring to kern/123053?

That's what the subject of the email says...

>
>> re0: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
>> 	options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
>> 	ether 00:1f:c6:52:7b:80
>> 	media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP <half-duplex>)
>> 	status: active
>>
>> Once I've assigned an IP to the interface, however, it comes up
>> correctly and seems to function just fine.  Is there any load testing
>
> I think, that's normal.
>
>> I should perform for you folks?
>>
>
> Try one of network benchmarks in ports/benchmarks if you want.
>
>> re0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu
>> 1500
>> 	options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
>> 	ether 00:1f:c6:52:7b:80
>> 	inet 10.0.0.38 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 10.0.255.255
>> 	media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
>> 	status: active

I've run some benchmarks, and they seemed to go pretty badly.  After  
running a few, I realized that I still had two network interfaces up,  
(em0, and the testing re0), I did an ifconfig em0 down, and was unable  
to connect in or out from the remaining re0.  Perhaps this code isn't  
all the way complete.

Eric

-----
Eric F Crist
Secure Computing Networks





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9484DE45-E872-4C83-A9F3-CA8A27368CEE>