Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:37:47 +0100 From: Milan Obuch <net@dino.sk> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multiple routing tables Message-ID: <200603211037.48439.net@dino.sk> In-Reply-To: <441FC5E0.5080604@packetfront.com> References: <441E0415.2040908@elischer.org> <441FC5E0.5080604@packetfront.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 10:22, Ragnar Lonn wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > I'm looking at a problem where I want onemachine to really look like 2. > > this means I want to have 2 separate routing tables if possible. > > > > I know I could do it with eas if I could user Marco Zec's vimage patches > > but I need to have a path forward to 6.x and beyond > > > > An answer would be to re-implement vimage for newer versions of > > FreeBSD but > > it's a bit of overkill and I was wondering if anyone had done anything > > in this direction? > > Implementing vimage (or similar) support in 6.x is something we are very > interested in and it might be possible for us to help out with such an > undertaking, if people thought it worthwhile. > > Regards, > I can only second on this. I found vimage really usefull for various tasks and just now I am building new server on 4.11-RELEASE with vimage patch because there is no other possibility for me to do what I need in an easy and elegant way. While Marco's patch goes way beyond multiple route tables support, it does everything really easy for me. Unfortunatelly, patch is too bulky for me to understand it - if anybody had something based on 6.0 or -current, I will test it, but nothing more. Regards, Milan -- Please reply to the mailing list only. This address is filtered.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603211037.48439.net>