Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:27:39 -0400
From:      Thomas Dickey <dickey@radix.net>
To:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: TERM={xterm-r5,xterm-r6} behaving badly with man(1)
Message-ID:  <20070728152739.GA29867@saltmine.radix.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0707281007310.21300@sea.ntplx.net>
References:  <Pine.GSO.4.64.0707281007310.21300@sea.ntplx.net>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 10:19:04AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> Sometime in the last few months, something changed...
> using TERM=xterm-r5 or TERM=xterm-r6.  I've been setting TERM=xterm-r5

I see that termcap source (whether derived from ncurses or xterm)
has for quite a while defined ti/te capabilities,
while terminfo source (still from ncurses or xterm) has not.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQFGq2BptIqByHxlDocRAprTAJ9Qm2wlmNCm3hD6iPOj1BfQkF6EnACfUyrp
Ks3UPsqKsnyEqRMcyEFKSKs=
=0z13
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070728152739.GA29867>