Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Jun 2014 13:40:59 -0400
From:      Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [CURRENT]: weird memory/linker problem?
Message-ID:  <53A7152B.9060901@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140622165639.17a1ba1e.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
References:  <20140622165639.17a1ba1e.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On 2014-06-22 10:56, O. Hartmann wrote:
> 
> Hello.
> 
> I face a strange problem on a set of CURRENT driven boxes. The systems in question are
> all the same version of CURRENT (more or less, a week or so discrepancy).
> 
> The boxes affected have 8 GB of RAM and are old-style Core2Duo systems.
> 
> The phenomenon:
> 
> Starting up the box shows the operating system working. But sometimes it is impossible to
> start certain applications, like Firefox - they segfault. More disturbing is the fail of
> the linker when building world. Sometimes I get strange messages like
> 
> relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against symbol `__error' defined in .text
> 
> when compiling/linking. The funny thing is: rebooting the box and doing exactly the same
> very often leaves the system then operable - starting applications works, compiling works!
> 
> First I thought this could be a indication of a dying system and so I checked the memory
> for two days non-stop without any indication of anything wrong. The boxes do not have ECC
> RAM - it's Intel.
> 
> I see this problem on two C2D based boxes relatively often (one E8400 two core, another
> Q6600 quadcore, both systems have 8 GB RAM). This phenomenon also occured two or three
> months ago on another machine with 32 GB RAM and a Core-i7 3930K, but it went away (it was
> the very same error as shown above).
> 
> Another system, a i3-3220 with 16 GB RAM never showed the problem although that system
> build world also on a regular basis very frequent as the C2D systems do.
> 
> Well, I feel a bit confused. On the first view, the problem looks weird and it indicates
> a kind of memory problem - but testing the memory didn't show anything wrong. 
> 
> Today "windowmaker" stopped starting due to a malformed command in one of windowmaker's
> library. I did reboot the box and everything was all right. Then, also today, I tried
> compiling world and I got a weird error message about a misspelled "Int__xxx", I can not
> remember exactly the text, I rebooted and everything was all right again.
> 
> Those errors are frequent on 8GB, C2D based systems and at the moment not present any
> more on more modern systems with more memory as described above. This could be a
> coincidence, but it is strange anyway.
> 
> I do not exclude dying hardware, but I'd like to ask whether there is something strange
> going on with FreeBSD's memory management at the moment and whether those problems could
> also be triggered by some nasty bug? I never see a crash (which would also indicated
> faulty hardware), I mostly realise those strange behaviour either after a fresh boot or
> after I ran some memory disk i/o intensive jobs, like updating the ports tree.
> 
> By the way, FreeBSD CURRENT suffer from a tremendous performance cut these days when
> compiling world and updating the ports tree and running portmaster. On one box, on which
> ports reside on a UFS partion, it takes more than 8 minutes to pass the portmaster -da,
> which is quick when not compiling world. On another system on which /usr/ports is
> residing on ZFS (the box has 16GB RAM!), it takes sometimes 30(!) minutes to perform a
> "svn update" while compiling world (that is the i3-3220 with 16 GB RAM system), it takes
> 6 - 15 minutes when the box is relaxed and updating the ports tree the first time (every
> subsequent update is much faster).
> 
> Well, I know these reports of mine are a bit weird since I have no exact log of the
> problems, but I think if there is an issue not with the hardware, I report those in.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> oh
> 

In order to get a better benchmark for 'svn update' on the ports tree

if you 'zfs unmount pool/usr/ports' it will flush all ARC entries for
that dataset, then 'zfs mount pool/usr/ports' and run the test again.
This should give you more reproducible results

-- 
Allan Jude


[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=LXDC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53A7152B.9060901>