Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 01:42:18 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226931] Deprecating jail(2) and related sysctls Message-ID: <bug-226931-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226931 Bug ID: 226931 Summary: Deprecating jail(2) and related sysctls Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Keywords: patch Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: kern Assignee: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: jamie@FreeBSD.org Flags: exp-run?, mfc-stable10-, mfc-stable11- Created attachment 191820 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=191820&action=edit Patch for exp-run jail(2) has been the old way of adding jails for nearly a decade, and it's past due for moving into COMPAT. Also, the sysctls under security.jail that went along with it are more confusing than useful for the modern jail_set(2) world, and they should go away as well. My plan is to put jail(2) under #ifdef COMPAT_FREEBSD11, and the sysctls under #ifndef BURN_BRIDGES. But I want to make sure I can find and hopefully fix any ports still using jail(2). So the included patch actually removes jail(2) and the sysctls entirely, regardless of those defines, so an exp-run should catch anything still running under the old system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-226931-8>