Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 08:01:19 -0600 From: Brad Davis <so14k@so14k.com> To: steve Rieger <steve@n2sw.com> Cc: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) Message-ID: <20050531140119.GC90363@ender.liquidneon.com> In-Reply-To: <b751e0fadb45476a621d49a3bc9e3be3@n2sw.com> References: <BAY21-F14C8EE506B422EAB90338DAE040@phx.gbl> <b751e0fadb45476a621d49a3bc9e3be3@n2sw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:20:59AM -0400, steve Rieger wrote: > > On May 31, 2005, at 7:14 AM, Sunil Sunder Raj wrote: > > >Hi, > >I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster > >with the load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on 10.0.0.1 is > > > >ext_if="fxp0" > >internal_smtp_servers="{ 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 }" > >rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port 25 -> > >$internal_smtp_servers round-robin sticky-address > > > >If 10.0.0.4 port 25 goes down, how do I force pf to remove 10.0.0.4 > >from its table. > > > >Regards > >Sunil Sunder Raj > > > > check out vrrp VRRP is for redundant routers. Regards, Brad Davis
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050531140119.GC90363>