Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:14:08 +0100 From: infoomatic <infoomatic@gmx.at> To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/jail.d (or jail.conf.d) Message-ID: <0c8d1fbc-eb38-0ea6-9238-ab3a10a8b21f@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <CACNAnaGGvA3xQ3fzcmnMboow1Wkdu%2Bt0h0hrqtdC6bTVbtoPkA@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 10.12.20 19:44, Kyle Evans wrote: > Currently it adds an /etc/jail.d, but the point was raised that we > have a mixture of these with different naming conventions and that > /etc/jail.conf.d may be better -- I'm inclined to agree since > jail.conf.d would more directly imply that the contents are > jail.conf(5) format while jail.d might be too vague, but we're looking > for input here. /etc/jail.conf.d seems to be the logical choice to keep naming consistent, so my vote is also with that.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0c8d1fbc-eb38-0ea6-9238-ab3a10a8b21f>