Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 15:48:28 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 254596] if_bridge wants LRO turned off, if_vlan insists it remain on Message-ID: <bug-254596-7501-PeeCU9v2Bk@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-254596-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-254596-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D254596 --- Comment #6 from paul vixie <paul@redbarn.org> --- (In reply to Ed Maste from comment #5) since it doesn't seem unreasonable to you, i'll do what you ask, but first i will test it. i think the patch is unreasonable and that it would be better to strike the= se two "if" statements than to containerize them to the non-bridge case. howev= er, what i'm actually proposing is less controversial in that it's unable to br= eak a working configuration. removing the LRO logic (those two if statements) c= ould indeed break working configurations. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-254596-7501-PeeCU9v2Bk>