Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:56:51 -0700 From: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-usb@freebsd.org" <freebsd-usb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Network TX/RX fairness is not honored by USB stack Message-ID: <20101004195651.GE4814@michelle.cdnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <201010042154.18353.hselasky@freebsd.org> References: <4CA94B13.7020809@freebsd.org> <20101004192908.GD4814@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <201010042154.18353.hselasky@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 09:54:18PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > > Personally I'd like to nuke the use of interrupt endpoint here but > > want to hear Han's opinion before doing that. > > If no data is ever transmitted except zero length packets, you can just nuke > it. > Controller always transfers meaningful 8 bytes data(about 1000times/sec) but interrupt callback didn't read it. Even if we can read that data, there is no use for that as link state changes are already handled by mii callback. It seems Linux wants to use that to show link UP/DOWN message though. > Rest of patch looks Ok. > Ok, thanks. > --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101004195651.GE4814>