Date: Mon, 10 Apr 1995 19:29:23 -0600 From: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams) To: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com> Cc: Brian Tao <taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw>, FREEBSD-CURRENT-L <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: man(1) bug Message-ID: <199504110129.TAA05570@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <95Apr10.173125pdt.49864@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> References: <Pine.BSI.3.91.950409151300.23082A-100000@aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw> <95Apr10.173125pdt.49864@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Fenner writes: > In message <Pine.BSI.3.91.950409151300.23082A-100000@aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw> > you write: > >Or as Rod Grimes noted, look at the 4.4BSD man instead. > > Or, perhaps, Tom Christiansen's perl man? Is this license too restrictive? Rod already mentioned the restrictive license. I'd like to point out that although my experience with the package itself has been positive, I have noticed a *LARGE* slowdown with Perl man vs. C-man which tainted my view of it a bit. This may have changed with Perl5, but Perl4 is what is shipped w/FreeBSD. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504110129.TAA05570>