Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:07:11 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> To: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> Subject: Re: At r212060, but /usr/bin/drace and /usr/sbin/lockstat still depend on libz.so.5 Message-ID: <20100906130711.GA49681@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik8V_3Nya-JuhfQFWsO7%2B7U3e4hGviw0ZdQ7idK@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100906125004.GA45452@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <AANLkTik8V_3Nya-JuhfQFWsO7%2B7U3e4hGviw0ZdQ7idK@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 05:03:31PM +0400, pluknet wrote: > On 6 September 2010 16:50, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> wrote: > > On sparc64 after updating to r212060, libz.so.5 came up > > as old library. I rebuit all ports to use > > libz.so.6 instead, but libchk still shows that > > > > Binaries that are linked with: /lib/libz.so.5 > > /usr/sbin/dtrace > > /usr/sbin/lockstat > > > > What did I do wrong that resulted in these 2 > > programs still linked against the old version > > of libz? > > > > Hi, Anton. > > After r210693, these utilities are built for i386 and amd64 only. > Thereby you have stale binaries installed from older sources. oh, I see. There is an ongoing thread on DTrace in -current. It's probably related to my issue? many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100906130711.GA49681>