Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 17:47:03 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Rong-En Fan <grafan@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_6_1 Message-ID: <44384B77.8010006@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <6eb82e0604081602u314fd213lf628319174d383e2@mail.gmail.com> References: <6eb82e0604081602u314fd213lf628319174d383e2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rong-En Fan wrote: > Hi, > > According to the webpage [1], 6.1 has been branched on April 5. However, > I noticed that there is a tag called RELENG_6_1, not a branch called > RELENG_6_1. For example, sys/conf/newvers.sh [2], rev 1.69.2.11, > is on RELENG_6 branch with tag RELENG_6_1_BP and RELENG_6_1. > > It is a bit strange for me. At least, we have RELENG_X_Y branch before > and RELENG_X_Y_BP tag. Is there any special reason that we have > a tag instead of a branch for 6.1? > > Regards, > Rong-En Fan > RELENG_6_1 is a branch tag (or at least it should have been unless I screwed it up). The _BP tag always comes before the branch tag. I just checked CVS and it appears to agree with this. Can you give an example of what is wrong? Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44384B77.8010006>