Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:45:28 +0100 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, doc-committers@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/projects/ideas index.sgml Message-ID: <200702171645.36536.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <20070217153019.F48994@fledge.watson.org> References: <200702161123.l1GBNZSD076510@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070217155538.wezh42xqeoswsw4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <20070217153019.F48994@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart585910052.jxvouB9nJQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 17 February 2007 16:38, Robert Watson wrote: > On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Quoting Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> (from Fri, 16 Feb 2007 > > 11:23:34 > > > > +0000 (UTC)): > >> rwatson 2007-02-16 11:23:34 UTC > >> > >> FreeBSD doc repository > >> > >> Modified files: > >> en/projects/ideas index.sgml > >> Log: > >> Update ZFS "todo" to say it's being done. Perhaps there is more=20 > >> than people > >> can help pjd with here, but they need to contact him first. We > >> need to decide if this item should still be on the TODO list. > > > > See my comments to the commit of joel. I really like the > > zombie-entries idea for the list, but if nobody else likes it too I > > don't try to push it further now. > > BTW, I followed up with Pawel on this one to ask about whether there > were any obvious project tasks to be done on ZFS, and the answer was > no. > > A general point: in a a few weeks, we're going to have hundreds of > students looking at the ideas page looking for concrete project ideas > to propose for summer of code. We should avoid putting things on the > ideas page if we don't want them done. We should make it clear for > each item that we think is worth exploring but aren't sure will be > committed that this is the case. This will avoid unhappiness later > when we say "Yeah, it was on the ideas list, but really, we don't want > that". I'm fine with having high level categories of ideas with > contacts, rather than having every idea there be specific and concrete, > but let's be very careful not to ask for things we don't want. Maybe it would be best if we would flag SoC compatible tasks as such and=20 leave the rest as is. There are certainly a lot of smaller, less=20 challanging tasks that - eventhough not suitable for SoC - should be on=20 the ideas page. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart585910052.jxvouB9nJQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBF1yMgXyyEoT62BG0RAhRUAJ9ncEnlM7lLP5iKHoxcoEMw10DLgQCdGN1A TIEFhHzFjHM2KISIStMHBjI= =odAF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart585910052.jxvouB9nJQ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200702171645.36536.max>