Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 13:30:50 -0700 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: dennis@etinc.com (dennis) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISDN: Sync vs Async. Was: Bragging rights.. Message-ID: <199510212030.NAA03863@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 21 Oct 1995 15:58:19 EDT." <199510211958.PAA05553@etinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>> dennis said:
> >>>> dennis said:
> > >
> > > >> If you can get an extras $50 or $100 a month the price of the card is
> > > >> recovered quite quickly. and since the smart sync uses less CPU at th
e hu
> > b,
> > > >
> >
> >Hmm...
> >
> >Now, if you can show that the telcos charge about $100 for a 128kb T1 line
> >then I can see your arguments for sync peripherals.
>
> I don't think that you understand this thread at all. We're talking about
> async ISDN vs sync ISDN, which has nothing to do with fractional T1 which
> you are referencing.
>
Oops, tnks for the clarification. Now what about hardware compression.
My Ascend Pipeline 50 has hardware data compression....
Cheers,
Amancio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510212030.NAA03863>