Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 2 Apr 1995 20:49:18 -0400 (EDT)
From:      -Vince- <vince@kbrown.oldcampus.yale.edu>
To:        "Paul F. Werkowski" <pw@snoopy.MV.COM>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: /etc/printcap for Deskjet 500 and gs
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.3.91.950402204306.27162H-100000@kbrown.oldcampus.yale.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199504022216.SAA09552@snoopy.mv.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2 Apr 1995, Paul F. Werkowski wrote:

> >>>>> "-Vince-" == -Vince-  <vince@kbrown.oldcampus.yale.edu> writes:
> 
>     -Vince-> On Sun, 2 Apr 1995, Paul F. Werkowski wrote:
>     >> >>>>> "-Vince-" == -Vince- <vince@kbrown.oldcampus.yale.edu>
>     >> writes:
>     >> 
>     >> 
> 
>     -Vince-> 	Hmmm, somehow no matter what paper I use, the ink
>     -Vince-> always bleed except when I print the postscript graphics
>     -Vince-> files...  Do you actually mean that the Jetprint is a
>     -Vince-> medium grade paper or do they have different grades of
>     -Vince-> Hammermill Jetprint?  Have you tried the Mead Inkjet
>     -Vince-> paper?  That paper didn't seem to make any difference but
>     -Vince-> the Jetprint seems to be good except the paper is kind of
>     -Vince-> hard to fold.
> 
> 	I said medium grade because the newspaper article suggested
> 	that it was: lets see if I can find the article...
> 
> 	Yes, "Hammermill Jet Print (200 sheets for $5) produced
> 	marginally better results than the quality laser bond
> 	and significantly better color than my everyday paper. But
> 	it didn't come close th the coated paper." The coated paper
> 	here was Avery Brilliant Color stock ($.16/sheet). The Jet
> 	Print is "a relatively inexpensive paper marketed for ink
> 	jet printers".
> 

	Are any of these papers actually the type with a watermark?  I 
wonder if any Watermark papers actually work well with the DeskJets.  Did 
they say anything about Strathmore Papers since those seem to be pretty
good papers.

> 	I agree that it is a bit stiffer than our normal printer fodder.
> 	I haven't tried the Mead. I guess you don't recommend it.
>

	Actually, you can try it since both Mead and Hammermill sends free
samples of the papers that they make...  Hammermills come in packs of 10 for
samples while the Mead ULTRATECH 24lb comes in sample of 25 sheets... 
Both Hammermill and Mead has a 100% Satisfaction Guarantee.  The number for
Mead is 1-800-832-MEAD and the number for Hammermill is 1-800-242-2148.  
Let me know how they compare.  Hammermill sends by RPS while Mead uses 
UPS for the shipping of the samples.
	 
> 	Paul

Cheers,
Vince
vince@kbrown.oldcampus.yale.edu
UCLA Physics/Electrical Engineering





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.91.950402204306.27162H-100000>