Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 21:07:38 GMT From: Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-branches@FreeBSD.org Subject: git: 094bd6281f72 - releng/14.1 - umtx: shm: Fix use-after-free due to multiple drops of the registry reference Message-ID: <202409042107.484L7cPg053564@gitrepo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The branch releng/14.1 has been updated by emaste: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=094bd6281f729e51c009586136634fafa501a398 commit 094bd6281f729e51c009586136634fafa501a398 Author: Olivier Certner <olce@FreeBSD.org> AuthorDate: 2024-09-04 14:38:12 +0000 Commit: Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: 2024-09-04 20:46:54 +0000 umtx: shm: Fix use-after-free due to multiple drops of the registry reference umtx_shm_unref_reg_locked() would unconditionally drop the "registry" reference, tied to USHMF_LINKED. This is not a problem for caller umtx_shm_object_terminated(), which operates under the 'umtx_shm_lock' lock end-to-end, but it is for indirect caller umtx_shm(), which drops the lock between umtx_shm_find_reg() and the call to umtx_shm_unref_reg(true) that deregisters the umtx shared region (from 'umtx_shm_registry'; umtx_shm_find_reg() only finds registered shared mutexes). Thus, two concurrent user-space callers of _umtx_op() with UMTX_OP_SHM and flags UMTX_SHM_DESTROY, both progressing past umtx_shm_find_reg() but before umtx_shm_unref_reg(true), would then decrease twice the reference count for the single reference standing for the shared mutex's registration. Reported by: Synacktiv Reviewed by: kib Approved by: emaste (mentor) Security: FreeBSD-SA-24:14.umtx Security: CVE-2024-43102 Security: CAP-01 Sponsored by: The Alpha-Omega Project Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D46126 (cherry picked from commit 62f40433ab47ad4a9694a22a0313d57661502ca1) (cherry picked from commit be7dc4613909e528e8b4ea8aaa3ae3aa62bec1ed) Approved by: so --- sys/kern/kern_umtx.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/sys/kern/kern_umtx.c b/sys/kern/kern_umtx.c index cecb4a021cfb..35fc87994c80 100644 --- a/sys/kern/kern_umtx.c +++ b/sys/kern/kern_umtx.c @@ -4383,39 +4383,49 @@ umtx_shm_free_reg(struct umtx_shm_reg *reg) } static bool -umtx_shm_unref_reg_locked(struct umtx_shm_reg *reg, bool force) +umtx_shm_unref_reg_locked(struct umtx_shm_reg *reg, bool linked_ref) { - bool res; - mtx_assert(&umtx_shm_lock, MA_OWNED); KASSERT(reg->ushm_refcnt > 0, ("ushm_reg %p refcnt 0", reg)); - reg->ushm_refcnt--; - res = reg->ushm_refcnt == 0; - if (res || force) { - if ((reg->ushm_flags & USHMF_LINKED) != 0) { - TAILQ_REMOVE(&umtx_shm_registry[reg->ushm_key.hash], - reg, ushm_reg_link); - LIST_REMOVE(reg, ushm_obj_link); - reg->ushm_flags &= ~USHMF_LINKED; - } + + if (linked_ref) { + if ((reg->ushm_flags & USHMF_LINKED) == 0) + /* + * The reference tied to USHMF_LINKED has already been + * released concurrently. + */ + return (false); + + TAILQ_REMOVE(&umtx_shm_registry[reg->ushm_key.hash], reg, + ushm_reg_link); + LIST_REMOVE(reg, ushm_obj_link); + reg->ushm_flags &= ~USHMF_LINKED; } - return (res); + + reg->ushm_refcnt--; + return (reg->ushm_refcnt == 0); } static void -umtx_shm_unref_reg(struct umtx_shm_reg *reg, bool force) +umtx_shm_unref_reg(struct umtx_shm_reg *reg, bool linked_ref) { vm_object_t object; bool dofree; - if (force) { + if (linked_ref) { + /* + * Note: This may be executed multiple times on the same + * shared-memory VM object in presence of concurrent callers + * because 'umtx_shm_lock' is not held all along in umtx_shm() + * and here. + */ object = reg->ushm_obj->shm_object; VM_OBJECT_WLOCK(object); vm_object_set_flag(object, OBJ_UMTXDEAD); VM_OBJECT_WUNLOCK(object); } mtx_lock(&umtx_shm_lock); - dofree = umtx_shm_unref_reg_locked(reg, force); + dofree = umtx_shm_unref_reg_locked(reg, linked_ref); mtx_unlock(&umtx_shm_lock); if (dofree) umtx_shm_free_reg(reg); @@ -4468,7 +4478,6 @@ umtx_shm_create_reg(struct thread *td, const struct umtx_key *key, if (!chgumtxcnt(cred->cr_ruidinfo, 1, lim_cur(td, RLIMIT_UMTXP))) return (ENOMEM); reg = uma_zalloc(umtx_shm_reg_zone, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO); - reg->ushm_refcnt = 1; bcopy(key, ®->ushm_key, sizeof(*key)); reg->ushm_obj = shm_alloc(td->td_ucred, O_RDWR, false); reg->ushm_cred = crhold(cred); @@ -4485,11 +4494,17 @@ umtx_shm_create_reg(struct thread *td, const struct umtx_key *key, *res = reg1; return (0); } - reg->ushm_refcnt++; TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&umtx_shm_registry[key->hash], reg, ushm_reg_link); LIST_INSERT_HEAD(USHM_OBJ_UMTX(key->info.shared.object), reg, ushm_obj_link); reg->ushm_flags = USHMF_LINKED; + /* + * This is one reference for the registry and the list of shared + * mutexes referenced by the VM object containing the lock pointer, and + * another for the caller, which it will free after use. So, one of + * these is tied to the presence of USHMF_LINKED. + */ + reg->ushm_refcnt = 2; mtx_unlock(&umtx_shm_lock); *res = reg; return (0);
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202409042107.484L7cPg053564>