Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:00:06 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Takeshi Ken Yamada <ken@tydfam.jp> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base. Message-ID: <20070413100006.GB5172@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <20070413.124151.74754693.ken@tydfam.jp> References: <20070410013034.GC8189@nowhere> <20070410014233.GD8189@nowhere> <20070410023857.GZ76673@garage.freebsd.pl> <20070413.124151.74754693.ken@tydfam.jp>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 12:41:51PM +0900, Takeshi Ken Yamada wrote: > Great work! > It works without any problems so far with my Opteron(dual core)X2 > -current box. > > Are there any i/o performance comparison data with UFS, even rough one? There are some numbers in my asiabsdcon paper, but ZFS was optimized quite a bit in several areas until then. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGH1SmForvXbEpPzQRAnB1AKDo2DcB1J734lVlvGsBkXb1C+HAMACfV1q5 QSQ4PfTbfk8wMn7BppezgDg= =SiK3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070413100006.GB5172>