Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:20:48 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG, luigi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: noisy ethernet drivers (was Re: 4.5-RC2 kernel, m_clalloc failed) Message-ID: <15438.61680.931767.691683@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <20020123105806.F59128@prism.flugsvamp.com> References: <1011797933.75400.19.camel@elmer.i.eunet.no> <15438.56988.569944.942146@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20020123105806.F59128@prism.flugsvamp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jonathan Lemon writes:
> I thought that luigi did that already when he put the centralized
> rate-limiting code in?
That's sort of what I was getting at. On Dec 16th, this was done:
luigi 2001/12/16 07:46:08 PST
Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4)
sys/pci if_pcn.c if_rl.c if_sf.c if_sk.c if_ste.c
if_ti.c if_tl.c if_vr.c if_wb.c
Log:
MFC: Remove printf's on mbuf/cluster allocation failures. There are now
equivalent and less dangerous (rate limited) messages in
the mbuf allocation code.
But it looks like there are still printfs in some of the more popular
drivers (fxp, xl, more??). Anybody know why those were omitted?
Drew
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15438.61680.931767.691683>