Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 13:53:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com> To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@MindBender.serv.net> Cc: Simon Shapiro <Shimon@i-connect.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IDE vs SCSI was: flags 80ff works (like anybody doubted it) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970826135157.10545B-100000@shell.uniserve.com> In-Reply-To: <199708261857.LAA23349@MindBender.serv.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 Aug 1997, Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com wrote: ... > I would think the disk subsystem would be the primary limiting factor > here. What mix of controllers and drives were these tests run on? > > It would also be interesting to run this simulation against a striped > set of SCSI drives. It would also be enlightening if you ran the same > test against your striped set of IDE drives. I'm sure this was done on a stripped drives, using the fastest known SCSI controller, and hardware cache. See "freebsd-scsi" archives. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@MindBender.serv.net > --< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >-- > NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3, > Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32... > NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others... > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970826135157.10545B-100000>