Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:50:23 +0400 From: "Alexey Karagodov" <karagodov@gmail.com> To: "Oleg Gritsak" <go@sib-ecometall.ru> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fast rate of major FreeBSD releases to STABLE Message-ID: <c7aff4ef0706052350w52b44796n97da5cb1c2289695@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20070525044123.GA34908@go.sib-ecometall.ru> References: <3aaaa3a0705170830g46487cc7occc8a51b82a9118b@mail.gmail.com> <f2j58r$hap$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070525044123.GA34908@go.sib-ecometall.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
all the problem of freebsd is that freebsd-team tries (mostly unsuccesfully) to do EVERYTHING freebsd team not just do freebsd, they doing freebsd5, freebsd6, freebsd7, ports, etc ... and nothing of this can work REALLY STABLE AND FUNCTIONAL i don't like linux, but sometimes i have to choose it i don't like openbsd, but some network features of openbsd i don't see in freebsd people, just try to do FreeBSD, not flavour ... thanx 2007/5/25, Oleg Gritsak <go@sib-ecometall.ru>: > > > Actually, I don't see how RELENG_X branch will help. %-\ > I would suggest this scheme: > > branch "." - as now, the recent versions > branch "sec" - versions bump strictly at 1-st of january and 1-st of july, > other updates fix only security issues. > > That would be really great improvement to ports, but not sure community > has enough programmers among port maintaners, so it's just another > dream.... :o( > > > > This looks like another call to have RELENG_x branches on ports, with > > which I agree. > > -- > системный администратор ООО "Сиб-ЭкоМеталл" > тел. (3912) 609942 (144) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c7aff4ef0706052350w52b44796n97da5cb1c2289695>