Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 22:22:10 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS status now in June? / stable enough for a file server? Message-ID: <20070623222109.K2020@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20070622204057.GB28975@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <1182338018.10483.27.camel@bigapple.omnis.ch> <20070622164200.GA2212@zone3000.net> <20070622214855.71c03e92@deskjail> <20070622204057.GB28975@cicely12.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Bernd Walter wrote: BW> Yours is fat as well: BW> CPU: AMD-K6tm w/ multimedia extensions (167.05-MHz 586-class CPU) BW> Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x561 Stepping = 1 BW> Features=0x8001bf<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,MCE,CX8,MMX> BW> AMD Features=0x400<<b10>> BW> real memory = 167772160 (160 MB) BW> avail memory = 158793728 (151 MB) BW> BW> Many things tuned to get ZFS runnning. BW> But it is used just as backup another bigger ZFS Server with BW> zfs receive. BW> I'm not shure if it would survive much file access from userland, BW> at least it can handle gzip-9 compression - well slow or course... BW> BW> [55]momax# zpool list BW> NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT BW> backup 87G 74.8G 12.2G 85% ONLINE - BW> BW> This very low configurtion makes it even possible to think about one BW> of the bigger Soekris with 256-512M RAM, although I would suggest to BW> use 512M for a real use ZFS, but backup with an 4801 seems to be BW> possible. Would you please post zfs-related settings you use? Thanks in advance. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070623222109.K2020>