Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 15:38:44 +0000 From: "Christian S.J. Peron" <csjp@freebsd.org> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ufs ufs_vnops.c Message-ID: <20040822153844.GA34925@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20040822122156.GK30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl> References: <200408220203.i7M23fb5001923@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040822122156.GK30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22 Aug 2004 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > In 5.x we are able to set securelevel per jail, so jail's system > administrator can increase securelevel if he needs this behaviour. > I agree, that we should stay consistent with 4.x, that's why we should > put this under some sysctl with default value, that keeps 4.x > behaviour, but it could be changed if jail's system administrator wants > to take control over system flags. Yes, I think everyone will agree that this is a good idea. -- Christian S.J. Peron csjp@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Committer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040822153844.GA34925>