Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 08:40:10 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236754] java/openjdk11: platform-specific include dir at wrong place Message-ID: <bug-236754-8522@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236754 Bug ID: 236754 Summary: java/openjdk11: platform-specific include dir at wrong place Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Many People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: java@FreeBSD.org Reporter: michael.osipov@siemens.com Flags: maintainer-feedback?(java@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: java@FreeBSD.org Based on a report on the mailing list. Previously: > [mosipov@mika-ion /usr/ports/java/openjdk8]$ tree /usr/local/openjdk8/inc= lude/ > /usr/local/openjdk8/include/ > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 classfile_constants.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 freebsd > =E2=94=82=C2=A0=C2=A0 =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jawt_md.h > =E2=94=82=C2=A0=C2=A0 =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jni_md.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jawt.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jdwpTransport.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jni.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jvmti.h > =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jvmticmlr.h now > [mosipov@mika-ion /usr/ports/java/openjdk8]$ tree /usr/local/openjdk11/in= clude/ > /usr/local/openjdk11/include/ > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 bsd > =E2=94=82=C2=A0=C2=A0 =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jawt_md.h > =E2=94=82=C2=A0=C2=A0 =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jni_md.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 classfile_constants.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jawt.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jdwpTransport.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jni.h > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jvmti.h > =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 jvmticmlr.h freesbd vs bsd in ports I see: > [mosipov@mika-ion /usr/ports/java/openjdk8]$ find . -name jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk/jdk/src/macosx/javavm/export/jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk/jdk/src/windows/javavm/export/jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk/jdk/src/solaris/javavm/export/jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk/hotspot/src/share/vm/prims/jni_md.h > [mosipov@mika-ion /usr/ports/java/openjdk11]$ find . -name jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk-jdk11u-jdk-11.0.2-9-2/src/java.base/unix/native/include/jn= i_md.h > ./work/openjdk-jdk11u-jdk-11.0.2-9-2/src/java.base/windows/native/include= /jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk-jdk11u-jdk-11.0.2-9-2/build/bsd-x86-normal-server-release/= support/modules_include/java.base/bsd/jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk-jdk11u-jdk-11.0.2-9-2/build/bsd-x86-normal-server-release/= support/interim-image/include/bsd/jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk-jdk11u-jdk-11.0.2-9-2/build/bsd-x86-normal-server-release/= jdk/include/bsd/jni_md.h > ./work/openjdk-jdk11u-jdk-11.0.2-9-2/build/bsd-x86-normal-server-release/= images/jdk/include/bsd/jni_md.h It seems to be a bug, because I expect this to be platform-specific, and not generalized. This also applies to openjdk12. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-236754-8522>