Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 09:22:29 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base) Message-ID: <25963.1141377749@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 03 Mar 2006 09:20:17 %2B0100." <20060303082016.GA17730@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20060303082016.GA17730@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>, Divacky Roman writes: >I think that Robert Ollivier strongly suggested using mercurial as our >(possibly) next vcs, so if any move from cvs then to mercurial.. Until somebody comes up with a killer argument, and none of those have been seen yet, it is extremely unlikely that we will change vcs at all. Considering how much stuff a change of vcs would affect, just think about all the scripts and routines the committers have on their development computers, a significantly better reason than "it is prettier" is required. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25963.1141377749>