Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 19:44:48 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Bill Squire <billsf@curacao.n2it.nl> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone use nullfs or unionfs ? Message-ID: <20040325034448.GF8779@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040323190700.GC4843@curacao.n2it.nl>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 08:07:00PM +0100, Bill Squire wrote: > Nullfs works fine on the high-end amd i386 machines, but is rather 'thrashy' > and inefficient on amd64. Is this a hardware bug or is there a patch to make > it work? ... > As for unionfs, it would be very nice if it truely worked. It seems to not > be able to deal with very large overlays. Please provide some details. You've given no motivation to developers to go look at something they might now have used before. HOW does it not work? Do you have logs showing this? Do you have ERROR MESSAGES showing this? Do you have a BENCHMARK showing this? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040325034448.GF8779>