Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Oct 1998 14:25:15 +0200
From:      Johann Visagie <wjv@cityip.co.za>
To:        Alex Knowles <alex@targeting.co.uk>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: newbie setup
Message-ID:  <19981015142515.A19135@cityip.co.za>
In-Reply-To: <615CAC0140CED111AF1500805FEDDB8A094A45@ns.new-mediacom.co.uk>; from Alex Knowles on Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 12:34:04PM %2B0100
References:  <615CAC0140CED111AF1500805FEDDB8A094A45@ns.new-mediacom.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998 at 12:34 SAT, Alex Knowles wrote:
>
> Hi first post etc etc I hope this is to the right place!

It would seem to be...  :-)

> I'm about to set a new server system for the company i work for and was
> planning to set a bsd box to run the web server/internal file server/print
> server.

Personally, I prefer to let NT do what it was designed to do, and be a
print/file server to Microsoft clients.  Part of the reason for this is that
the management tools on NT can be explained to an advanced Windows user, and
I don't have to mess with it myself all the time.

On the other hand, Samba provides a highly configurable file service for
Microsoft clients, and according to many reports it's more
resource-efficient.  Personally, I prefer to use Samba's tools to do trouble
shooting on NetBEUI networks.

> Can anyone forsee any problems with this plan? the office uses nt and
> mac. I have previously used redhat (this is probably a dangerous
> admission to make on this group!!) and I know that it can only see fat16
> on internal partitions, but it would be ok to use smb to see nt folders

There should be no need to have any FAT partitions on the BSD box.  And yes,
you can access NT shares (and even mount them) using Samba's toolset.

> 	will Nt be able to read files stored on the bsd box and vice versa

Yup.

> 	will macs be able to do the same (particularly g3's)

I'll leave that to someone else.  No Macs in sight here.

> 	will an nt outlook server be able to run in parallel 

Don't see why not.  It's completely independent, after all.

> 	we also want to have an automatic dat backup, can anyone forsee any
> problems/software we need etc. or is it easier for an nt box to do this ? 

I would strongly recommend you stick a DAT (or other tape) drive directly in
the FreeBSD box itself for backup purposes.  It's probably advisable to let
the BSD and NT boxes each do their own backups on their own drives.

> and then hardware compatibility:
> I shall probably have the following spec:
> PII 450 or 350
> adaptec 2940 UW SCSI controller
> 9 Gig Fast wide SCSI Hard drive
> 100 Mb/s 3com network card
> S3 Virge Graphics card

Probably overkill, esp. that processor.  :-)  But if you can afford it, hell,
go for it...

> Connected to an optic line via a 3com router 

Ugh, I hate those 3Com routers.  :-)

> I'm really sorry this post is so long. 
> and thanks alot in advance. 

Not a problem.  Hope this helps a bit.

-- V

Johann Visagie | wjv@CityIP.co.za | Tel: +27 21 419-7878 | ICQ: 20645559

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981015142515.A19135>