Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Jan 2000 17:48:15 -0500
From:      "Patrick Bihan-Faou" <patrick@mindstep.com>
To:        "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Cc:        "Luigi Rizzo" <luigi@info.iet.unipi.it>, "Harold Gutch" <logix@foobar.franken.de>, <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Nate Williams" <nate@mt.sri.com>
Subject:   Re: ipfw optimizations
Message-ID:  <014501bf5961$48cc6dc0$c80aa8c0@local.mindstep.com>
References:  <200001072234.OAA13343@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> No, this is completly reasonable now that I understand what it is your
> proposing.  Even the memory footprint is minimal if pointers to the
> actual rules is all we store in the per interface list, my largest set
> duplicated over 8 interfaces would only be 3200 rules.  Stored as
> pointers to rules this would be all of 12.8kbytes, certainly not
> enough to worry about :-).

Good.... I felt like I was stupid for a while here ;-)


> Come up with some patches and I'll be glad to test and review them
> for you...

I'll get on that as soon as I am done with that paying job I am doing now
:(. Which probably means sometime next week. (don't you hate to have these
bills to pay ?)


Patrick.





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?014501bf5961$48cc6dc0$c80aa8c0>