Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 18:55:14 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mike Schreckengost <mrpolitics@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1-BETA2 install results Message-ID: <20030522155514.GA32442@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20030522112818.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <20030522064400.GA59146@sunbay.com> <XFMail.20030522112818.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 11:28:18AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: >=20 > On 22-May-2003 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 07:10:24PM -0400, Mike Schreckengost wrote: > > [...] > >> I just performed a 'clean' install of 5.0-BETA2, and have encountered = a few=20 > >> issues which may (or may not!) be considered as 'bugs'. > >=20 > >> Issues encountered: > >>=20 > > [...] > >> 3) The 'krb5' and 'ports' distributions failed to install over FTP fro= m=20 > >> ftp://ftp5.FreeBSD.org. I noticed in a prior post to this list that th= e=20 > >> krb5 distro was folded into 'crypto', which appears to be correct. How= ever,=20 > >> sysinstall still looks for 'krb5' separately and issues an error when = it=20 > >> can't be found. > >>=20 > > That's clearly still the case; attached is the patch. Please someone > > from re@ review and commit it. >=20 > I have a similar patch already. However, there is the remaining issue of > the skrb5 distribution. If krb5 is going to be removed, skrb5 needs to > be fixed as well. >=20 While it may seem confusing at a glance, it's okay (skrb5). Example: we don't provide "share" distribution, but we have "sshare" source distribution. Similarly here, we don't provide "krb5" distribution any more (it's part of the "crypto" distribution), but we provide "skrb5" distribution, in the same location as "scrypto" and "ssecure", in ${CHROOTDIR}/R/ftp/crypto/. > Also, have you tested a release with this patch? >=20 Since it only affects sysinstall(8), I just recompiled the latter, and played with it for a bit on a running system. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+zPLiUkv4P6juNwoRAiIpAJ46HPMoZGv1m5gaia5EjfY3gYCK6ACfXeYC +tvfR3WilUgpzhhVjzrCXL8= =+ZnU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030522155514.GA32442>