Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:24:36 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: was: CURRENT [r307305]: r307823 still crashing Message-ID: <20161023182436.4d3bac4f.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <20161015121321.25007de8.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <20161014104833.7a2ac588@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <20161015102242.3c0f2fbb.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20161015121321.25007de8.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Am Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:13:21 +0200 "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> schrieb: > Am Sat, 15 Oct 2016 10:22:42 +0200 > "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> schrieb: > > > Am Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:48:33 +0200 > > "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> schrieb: > > > > > Systems I updated to recent CURRENT start crashing spontaneously. > > > > > > recent crashing system is on > > > 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #11 r307305: Fri Oct 14 08:37:59 CEST 2016 > > > > > > other (no access since it is remote and not accessible until later the day) has > > > been updated ~ 12 hours ago and it is alos rebooting/crashing without any > > > warnings. Can be triggered on heavy load. > > > > > > Only system with r307263 and stable so far is an older two-socket XEON > > > Core2Duao based machine, all crashing boxes have CPUs newer or equal than > > > IvyBridge. > > > > > > Does anyone also see these crashes? I tried to compile a debug kernel on one > > > host, but that's the remote machine I have access to later, it failed compiling > > > the kernel - under load it crashed often. After ZFS scrubbing kickied in, it > > > vanished from the net ;-/ > > > > > > kind regards, > > > oh > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Still 307341 is crashing undpredicted ( FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #5 r307341: Sat Oct 15 > > 09:36:16 CEST 2016). > > > > I'm back to r307157, which seems to be "stable". > > > > Seems, I'm the only one at the moment having those problems :-( > > I now have a laptop avalable and start putting debugging options into the kernel. But > the laptop, so far, doesn't expose the problems of crashes described above. The laptop > is the only system so far without ZFS! > > The most frequent crashing box is a CURRENT server with the largest ZFS volume. When on > most recent CURRENT (>r307157, see above), starting a scrubbing on a RAIDZ volume with ~ > 12 TB brutto size AND running a poudriere job, triggers the crash every 1 - 18 minutes. > Another box with only /home as ZFS volume on a dedicated hdd crashes after minutes or > hours. A laptop, also CURRENT (now at r307349) without ZFS is working stable as long as > I do not pull the LAN wire (a problem I described also in the list, I try to capture the > screen when crashing right now). I spent now the last three days trying to figure out whether my custom config is faulty or CURRENT has a serious bug. Even with GENERIC and in single user mode (it takes then longer) CURRENT, now at r307823, is crashing. The crashes seem to be unrelated to X11, but I can trigger this crash faster when using firefox. I also can trigger it faster when doing a "svn update" on a ZFS pool containing /usr/ports. Everyone who uses ZFS on /usr/src or /usr/ports and updates via subversion knows that over time the update process takes 10 - 15 minutes on ZFS volumes - compared to several minutes on UFS. And while svn traverses the folder /usr/ports, the crash occurs. I'm still wondering about the fact nobody else is facing such a periodically crashing. The crash is, I already reported this, with CURRENT on several boxes with or without ZFS. How can I track a memory leak? How can I write to disk the backtrace given by the debugger when crashing? My box I can freely test is using the nVidia BLOB and vt(), so I can not see the backtrace. I got a very bad screenshot on one of my laptops, but its so ugly/unreadable, I think it is unsuable to be presented within this list at a reasonable size (200 kB max ist too small). [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYDOREAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8MbsH/iN4jAEKYGvBd18wtjt4F7b1 8vCDVZ52bOICsp5d+1M1d+J1KZhdvh12Wr04ClBAOMuvkHRgDENaccZHrxruoEBQ rcjHBrfJgiwluMLdS0kmGM0bjjQo/+bTGj4nFrW1FNPcrQyPfyEw+Lko7BncX7sR vTWlup+li3kI1/J1NwImPYipl6y821vUjJNZ4bQVVBobtJ5rKxT64S6qg6Y8zV/C +3Cc66QV54T2AONhNdCWUfIcJ4TvAZPdJl4d3nCvTZv2mS8SpAXbWeQoPUKSSoyG ybOkIoCJ8GtjdH+/E8KA0MfZ60xPtQWBxImz3h/WIQ9dp3IYdW7J8+yGgpv5gCs= =B63N -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161023182436.4d3bac4f.ohartman>