Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:14:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org, hsu@clinet.fi, scrappy@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/528 Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.92.960411001321.2310A-100000@freebsd.ki.net> In-Reply-To: <199604101934.FAA04023@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Apr 1996, Bruce Evans wrote: > > Understood...reopened and responsibility changed to you. After > >reading this, I had thought that maybe making TTYHOG change with a > >change in RS_IBUFSIZE might work, except that TTYHOG is also used in > >relation to at least two other defines that I've found. > > Yes, TTYHOG is "machine-independent". Increasing it to 4K or more might > be best for sio, but then lots of memory would be wasted for ptys. > I guess that putting a TTYHOG/PTYHOG in sys/tty.h wouldn't be acceptable to circumvent this problem? I don't assume that pty's generate the error that it is we are trying to fix, so seperating the *HOG defines would make sense, no? Marc G. Fournier scrappy@ki.net Systems Administrator @ ki.net scrappy@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.92.960411001321.2310A-100000>