Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Nov 1996 12:59:06 -0800
From:      Richard Stanford <richards@herald.net>
To:        dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Cc:        isp@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: changed to: Frac T3?
Message-ID:  <32921F9A.48EA@herald.net>
References:  <199611191536.KAA07083@etinc.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
dennis wrote:
> >
> >In fact, there is a _great_ deal of painful experience in dealing with
> >routers where there isn't quite enough CPU time to get everything done.
> >Routing protocols are basically soft real-time distributed systems.  When
> >they get delayed, they tend to collapse in spectacular ways.  As a result,
> >putting any significant non-routing load on a router is a _really_ bad
> >idea.
> 
> that's 'cause you've been working with machines that have stinky little CPUs
> :-)

I would hazard a guess that having a couple of large compiles kicked off
at the same time would start to cause the routing system a little stress
-- no matter what cpu was in the box.  Difference would be how long the
stress lasted.

-Richard



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?32921F9A.48EA>