Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:28:46 +0100 From: Jon Mercer <jon.mercer@achean.com> To: "Liam J. Foy" <liamfoy@sepulcrum.org> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Negative Review of FreeBSD 5.4 Message-ID: <1117736926.772.3.camel@odysseus.office.achean.com> In-Reply-To: <20050602180147.GA790@anarion> References: <429EF96E.16172.33600ABA@localhost> <20050602100934.Y20286@Osgiliath.home.lan> <60053.217.33.199.34.1117734722.squirrel@webmail.achean.com> <20050602180147.GA790@anarion>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 19:01 +0100, Liam J. Foy wrote: > > The same reviewer did a review of OpenBSD a couple of articles previously: > > > > http://os.newsforge.com/os/05/05/20/1426216.shtml?tid=8 > > > > On the whole his experience looked worse than with FreeBSD, but the tone > > of the OBSD article was more favorable. Anyone else notice this? > > > > Jem Matzan just seems to be anti-FreeBSD. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Achean Ltd http://www.achean.com > > Jon Mercer jon.mercer@achean.com Director > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-advocacy-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Jem Matzan is known for poor reviews throughout *BSD. > Ah yes, thejemreport.com, not egotistical at all... Hang on, isn't his 5.4 review nothing more than a slight rewording of the 5.3 review??? This could turn out as character assassination as well as OS assassination. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Achean Ltd http://www.achean.com Jon Mercer jon.mercer@achean.com Director -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1117736926.772.3.camel>