Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 11:07:31 -0700 (PDT) From: "Eric J. Schwertfeger" <ejs@bfd.com> To: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@iMach.com> Cc: Mike Pontillo <mike_p@revenge.pylos.net>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NICs Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910121102550.17801-100000@harlie.bfd.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.991012113001.29012B-100000@workhorse.iMach.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Forrest W. Christian wrote: > That said, the Intel EtherExpress family seem to work EXTREMELY well and > extremely good. I put them in all my customer's "high-end" freebsd boxes > and in my customer's high-end servers. Should have been more explicit, this was for a firewall/VPN box. Stability of the Win9X boxes is not as much an issue, and the vendors tend to test better for that environment anyway. Then again, my home network is switched 100BaseT, with all EtherExpressPro cards. I thought it was worth the $46 each for the cards. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9910121102550.17801-100000>