Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:23:06 +0100 (CET) From: "Karl H. Beckers" <karl.h.beckers@gmx.net> To: "Daniel Eischen" <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: "Karl H. Beckers" <karl.h.beckers@gmx.net>, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: threading in FreeBSD (acx_pthreads) Message-ID: <58004.192.9.112.196.1202145786.squirrel@www.our-isp.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802041157030.13899@sea.ntplx.net> References: <5913.192.9.112.196.1202124683.squirrel@www.our-isp.org> <86ve54epyy.fsf@ds4.des.no> <43451.192.9.112.196.1202141118.squirrel@www.our-isp.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802041112260.13899@sea.ntplx.net> <86zlugd5u0.fsf@ds4.des.no> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802041157030.13899@sea.ntplx.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
whoa, slowly please, you're loosing me. So, there is: -lthr -pthread -lpthread -lc_r lthread -kthread I've read one opinion (a) saying I should use: -lthr -lpthread -lc_r (because -pthread might not be safe on all versions) the autoconf module (b) does: -kthread lthread -pthread (now what's -kthread and lthread and how do they relate to -lthr or -lc_r) And the other opinion (c) I heard was: -pthread -lc_r (and leave anything else to the user and PTHREAD_LIBS) And I take it that (c) is what your ports system is doing and the discussion is around whether that's the right thing to do? Karl.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?58004.192.9.112.196.1202145786.squirrel>