Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 09:23:37 +0200 From: Gour <gour@atmarama.net> To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: run vs urtwn Message-ID: <877fso4xhi.fsf@atmarama.ddns.net> In-Reply-To: <1D4CCB1C-2D5E-467D-89B8-23ADAEF571CB@gmail.com> References: <87lhh5u928.fsf@atmarama.ddns.net> <1D4CCB1C-2D5E-467D-89B8-23ADAEF571CB@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Felix Friedlander <felixphew0@gmail.com> writes: > If you are wanting to purchase an adapter, any of those 3 would be fine. So, there is no significant difference in quality between the rsu and urtwn drivers? > However, have you considered using your builtin NIC with ndis(4)? Well, I wanted to avoid extra hassle. :-) > [See section 12.5.1.1 of the FreeBSD Handbook][1] for instructions, or > reply to this email if you need help. Thank you. I'll try, but I wonder how often I'd have to do it? Every major upgrade of my OS? The performance should be equal or on par with reverse-engineered drivers like rsu/urtwn? Sincerely, Gour -- Those who are on this path are resolute in purpose, and their aim is one. O beloved child of the Kurus, the intelligence of those who are irresolute is many-branched.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?877fso4xhi.fsf>