Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 22:27:32 -0500 (CDT) From: Bruce Albrecht <bruce@zuhause.mn.org> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net> Cc: Alex Zepeda <garbanzo@hooked.net>, John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, asmodai@wxs.nl, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os Message-ID: <14093.29000.147643.10859@zuhause.mn.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9904081223480.378-100000@picnic.mat.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904072109480.94006-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9904081223480.378-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chuck Robey writes: > If that were true, but it's not. Older versions of the config files and > libraries can very easily cause the ports to fail to build. Every time > I upgrade stuff, I have to go about doing search and destroy on old > stuff. On top of that, there are various mistakes in dependencies; > there's one lib (I forget which) which installs under one name, but all > of the dependencies on it are under another name. The stuff seems to > change it's mind on whether it wants to install under /usr/local or > /usr/X11R6, so finding stuff is pretty complicated, and very dependent > on version, because the darn install dirs change, just to make things > worse. I'll bet the library you're thinking of is libtix. David O'Brien just committed fixes for it yesterday. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14093.29000.147643.10859>