Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:54:25 +1100 From: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> To: Marcelo Araujo <araujo@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r295796 - head/sys/net Message-ID: <3d13be6a-53e6-c224-2fab-304fd34691eb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAOfEmZjH-C-wbrF9A-WHfwBkbFfsmzWbuaYjkgpGGvHuSxw7hA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201602190635.u1J6Zr9S077166@repo.freebsd.org> <7f58daf2-24a4-d0eb-e66d-2bb7a591510e@FreeBSD.org> <CAOfEmZjH-C-wbrF9A-WHfwBkbFfsmzWbuaYjkgpGGvHuSxw7hA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19/02/2016 6:07 PM, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > > > 2016-02-19 15:03 GMT+08:00 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@freebsd.org > <mailto:koobs@freebsd.org>>: > > On 19/02/2016 5:35 PM, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > > Author: araujo > > Date: Fri Feb 19 06:35:53 2016 > > New Revision: 295796 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/295796 > > > > Log: > > Fix regression introduced on 272446r. > > > > lagg(4) supports the protocol none, where it disables any traffic without > > disabling the lagg(4) interface itself. > > > > PR: 206921 > > Submitted by: Pushkar Kothavade <pushkarbk@gmail.com <mailto:pushkarbk@gmail.com>> > > Reviewed by: rpokala > > Approved by: bapt (mentor) > > MFC after: 3 weeks > > Sponsored by: gandi.net <http://gandi.net>; > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5076 > > > > 10.3-R candidate? > > > Yes, it is! > > But the patch for 10-Stable is different than the one for HEAD, because > lagg(4) code change between releases. > > Patch for 10-Stable here: > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5226 > > I have contacted re@ already! I will do again. > > > Best, > -- > > -- > Marcelo Araujo (__) > araujo@FreeBSD.org <mailto:araujo@FreeBSD.org> \\\'',) > http://www.FreeBSD.org <http://www.freebsd.org/>; \/ \ ^ > Power To Server. .\. /_) > Much love, thank you Marcelo! Might help marking these as such in the original head commit to prevent annoying people (me) from pinging about it :) For example, I'm also interested in all the recent PVS fixes, none of which were marked for MFC, but appear to be very good at least stable/10,9 candidates, if not 10.3-R. ./koobs
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3d13be6a-53e6-c224-2fab-304fd34691eb>