Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:25:39 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Bob Hall <rjhjr0@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Restarting hal Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0907251256160.46564@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <20090725190832.11e6843d.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20090723174350.GA1346@stamfordbru> <20090724085743.9abb7f2e.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090724150239.GA1167@stamfordbru> <20090725084138.f4338065.freebsd@edvax.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0907250755160.45709@wonkity.com> <20090725190832.11e6843d.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:56:17 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote: >> >> Option "AutoAddDevices" "Off" should disable hal devices even if >> xorg-server has been built with hal. > > I'm aware of this. Just trying to point out the options, and that a one-line change in xorg.conf is lower impact than rebuilding xorg-server. > There are other "workarounds" to get the default stuff working again > (option Don't-Zap for example), so X installations relying on > xorg.conf can work again. Since some defaults have changed in newer versions of xorg, that last sentence is confusing. Maybe s/default stuff working again/legacy behavior/ s/work/work as expected/ -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0907251256160.46564>