Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:41:59 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias <sonic2000gr@gmail.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/163102: linprocfs mounted in wrong location in Handbook Message-ID: <4EE104F7.8080209@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EE0F540.3090309@FreeBSD.org> References: <201112070700.pB770Pe9019222@freefall.freebsd.org> <4EE0F540.3090309@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/12/2011 7:34 μμ, John Baldwin wrote: > On 12/7/11 2:00 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: >> The following reply was made to PR docs/163102; it has been noted by >> GNATS. >> >> From: Sergey Kandaurov<pluknet@gmail.com> >> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, VoidChicken@gmail.com >> Cc: >> Subject: Re: docs/163102: linprocfs mounted in wrong location in >> Handbook >> Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:22:54 +0300 >> >> /compat is a symlink to usr/compat >> So, nothing is wrong here for me. > > If /compat/linux is the official path, then the default linprocfs > mountpoint should be /compat/linux/proc (that is what I always use). > Just like the default home dir is /home/<foo>, not /usr/home/<foo>. > /compat could just as easily be a different filesystem or a symlink to > somewhere else. So I do think the Handbook should be updated regardless. > You may have noticed the Handbook is already updated. You are right about /compat, in fact the linuxemu chapter uses this and not /usr/compat. There were only four instances in the Handbook where the user was asked explicitly to use /usr/compat and all were fixed.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EE104F7.8080209>