Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 19:33:30 +0200 (SAT) From: John Hay <jhay@icomtek.co.za> To: jeff-ml@mountin.net (Jeffrey J. Mountin) Cc: jhay@icomtek.co.za (John Hay), Mike@perlguru.com (Mike), freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SSH in 4.1 RELEASE for NonUS users Message-ID: <200007291733.e6THXUn88664@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.20000729114028.00ac5a20@207.227.119.2> from "Jeffrey J. Mountin" at "Jul 29, 2000 12:03:31 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >You have 2 options. If you have the crypto distribution with source, you
> >can go into /usr/src/secure/lib/librsaintl and build and install it. If
> >you don't want to build it, you can install the crypto distribution from
> >ftp.internat.freebsd.org, its crypto distibution was built with
> >USA_RESIDENT=NO and should give you librsaINTL* which is what is needed.
>
> Doesn't one also need the following in make.conf:
>
> MAKE_RSAINTL= YES # RSA (public key exchange)
>
> The change was done earlier this month. Replaced RSAREF and was
> WITH_RSAINTL until the 14th. Setting USA_RESIDENT=YES is only a part of
> the check:
>
> .if exists(${.CURDIR}/../../crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c) && \
> (${USA_RESIDENT} != YES || defined(MAKE_RSAINTL))
> SUBDIR+=librsaintl
> .endif
>
No, you only need USA_RESIDENT=NO. It won't harm if you have MAKE_RSAINTL=YES,
but it isn't needed. MAKE_RSAINTL=YES is meant as a kind of override if
USA_RESIDENT=YES I think. Maybe the idea was to be able to build both.
John
--
John Hay -- John.Hay@icomtek.csir.co.za
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007291733.e6THXUn88664>