Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:30:21 +0800 From: OutBackDingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>, Adrian Penisoara <ady@freebsd.ady.ro> Subject: Re: [OT] Q: what would you choose for a VCS today Message-ID: <1201800621.7849.8.camel@myhost> In-Reply-To: <47A18EDA.4040501@elischer.org> References: <78cb3d3f0801302245v2183c613t6ecdd9acebbe9ef7@mail.gmail.com> <47A1700B.3090406@gmail.com> <47A18EDA.4040501@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'm having to use mercurial. > I'm not really enjoying it. > works ok for small projects. BSD is a bit big for it. > doe work foe offline editing, but loses all your BSD history. > > probably SVK is the way to go from what I hear. Im using mercurial on full FreeBSD trees, curiosity makes me ask where do you the deficiency? Ive had no issues patching, branching, merging, transplanting, tracking vendor updates. The only issue i really had was a import of the full cvs tree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1201800621.7849.8.camel>