Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 May 2003 15:20:52 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/avr-libc Makefile
Message-ID:  <20030519222052.GA8210@rot13.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030519235424.C21682@uriah.heep.sax.de>
References:  <20030519104604.GB17366@sunbay.com> <20030519125334.D2937@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20030519114332.GG17366@sunbay.com> <20030519115339.GI17366@sunbay.com> <20030519121239.GA6087@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030519143325.H2937@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20030519153809.1b01f51b.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <20030519155824.M2937@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20030519213123.GG7480@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030519235424.C21682@uriah.heep.sax.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 11:54:24PM +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> As Kris Kennaway wrote:
>=20
> > > > People which don't care about some few percent more performance
> > > > don't need the default CPUTYPE, those who care will figure out how
> > > > to do it.
> > >=20
> > > That's exactly my point.
> >=20
> > Joerg, can you please try and keep your bsd.cpu.mk axe-grinding
> > separate from this discussion about the bug in your port?  The place
> > to discuss bsd.cpu.mk is in another thread.
>=20
> Well, this was Alexander's comment... but anyway, no, bsd.cpu.mk is
> exactly the problem.  Without it poisoning the default CFLAGS, this
> port worked/works fine.

Setting CFLAGS is a supported, legal operation that is required to be
supported by every other port in the collection.  Ports that break
when CFLAGS are broken, end of story.  This brokenness was *revealed*
by the recent bsd.cpu.mk commit, but as we've established it was there
all along.  It's now up to you, the port maintainer, to fix your ports
so they conform to the standards of the ports collection.

I hope I've now made this sufficiently clear that you can just fix the
problem and we can both move on to more important things.

Thanks,
Kris


--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+yVjEWry0BWjoQKURAjstAKDIrCPrzMJcNMXL8Hkotniy2n9G5wCgrNHy
hdYUVX9LP6RoFr6iX2+jlyY=
=bDZM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030519222052.GA8210>