Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:09:26 +0100 From: Massimo Lusetti <massimo@cedoc.mo.it> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Paul Allen <nospam@ugcs.caltech.edu>, David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Comments on the KSE option Message-ID: <1162199366.4309.6.camel@massimo.datacode.it> In-Reply-To: <20061028204357.A83519@fledge.watson.org> References: <45425D92.8060205@elischer.org> <200610281132.21466.davidxu@freebsd.org> <20061028105454.S69980@fledge.watson.org> <20061028194125.GL30707@riyal.ugcs.caltech.edu> <20061028204357.A83519@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 20:47 +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > significantly slower than multi-process ones. Many programmers believe that > threading is necessarily faster than using multiple processors, so I think > we're fundamentally forced to deal with the way they do use them, rather than > how they should use them. I'm in sync with your opinion but speaking from the point of view of a programmer which use FreeBSD i would like to say that enforcing (or at least try to) good understanding of issues and good programming practice is a good thing(TM), so if FreeBSD as an O.S. and as a community try to enforce me to have good programming attitudes i really would like to follow that. FWIW what have made me switched my whole job to FreBSD six years ago was exactly the good practices enforced in FreeBSD itself. Regards -- Massimo.run();
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1162199366.4309.6.camel>