Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:59:38 -0400 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd daemon chick wallpaper?? Message-ID: <3EF0A88A.6040002@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20030618173637.GB32151@rfc822.net> References: <3EF061D9.7000609@potentialtech.com> <200306181612.KAA21256@lariat.org> <20030618165119.GA31988@rfc822.net> <3EF0A086.6000103@potentialtech.com> <20030618173637.GB32151@rfc822.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pete Ehlke wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:25:26PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > >>confused by pointers doesn't mean she can't write useful code. I mean, many >>of the high-level languages don't even use pointers, right? > > I've heard this, as well. I don't trust any of them. Hmmm ... languages without pointers shouldn't segfault, should they? And yet, yesterday, through the wee hours and into today I've managed to accidentally make perl segfault dozens of times. I think you may be right. Unless you're speaking of not trusting women, then I don't really know. (It's amazing how quickly a sloppily written perl script can eat up 384M of RAM, 700M of swap and fall over dead! Boy, these newer computers are fast!) -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EF0A88A.6040002>