Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 00:58:59 +0100 From: Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@catflap.org> To: ronald-lists@klop.ws, jamie@catflap.org, freebsd@grem.de Cc: pstef@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: changes to ps -d? Message-ID: <202309192358.38JNwx5P004094@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> In-Reply-To: <202309192326.38JNQORU003616@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> References: <925097787.3785.1695119378729@localhost> <634385E4-6E9A-410F-9BDC-2E2B97A8C46F@grem.de> <375102065.5853.1695129769542@localhost> <202309192326.38JNQORU003616@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@catflap.org> wrote: > If you make "-D down" the default (as you suggested in a previous message), then > we would be back to having the problem. To expand on that, if a "-D none" option is added, and "-D down" becomes the default, then from my personal point of view, that would be fine. I can easily modify my stuff to add that. It comes down to what Piotr wants to do, and whether you think there is more disruption going back to pre-12.2-release, than there would be now you're used to the new behaviour since 12.2-release. As I was the only person who seems affected by the 12.2-release changes, maybe the newest breaking change is the more noticable? What I'm saying is that personally, I don't care, as long as the pre 12.2-release mode of operation is available somehow, discussions on which should be the default today are way beyond my pay grade :-) Cheers, Jamiehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202309192358.38JNwx5P004094>