Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:48:44 -0800
From:      Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com>, svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-stable-7@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: svn: stable/7/sys: conf dev/bce
Message-ID:  <20091130204844.9bec6460.stas@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B149BFF.50700@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200911151143.nAFBhTSD036619@svn.freebsd.org> <4B141D2E.1000203@FreeBSD.org> <4B142655.6030703@tomjudge.com> <4B14382F.5080000@FreeBSD.org> <4B149BFF.50700@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Mon__30_Nov_2009_20_48_44_-0800_TBpGg.ujfEwuWyU8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:30:55 -0800
Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> mentioned:

> Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > Tom Judge wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> >>> Is the option related to Jumbo Frames in any way? If not, IMHO the na=
me
> >>> should be changed to avoid any confusion.
> >>
> >> The bug is easier to reproduce when jumbo frames are turned on however
> >> we have seen it with normal frames also.
> >=20
> > Can we change the name then? We've seen the similar issue without the=20
> > jumbo frames, which made me wonder. Also, perhaps we should make it a=20
> > default and/or tunable. Having user to recompile kernel just to save 20=
=20
> > bytes of text segment is not very practical these days.
>=20
> Here is the patch:
>=20
> http://sobomax.sippysoft.com/~sobomax/bce.diff
>=20
> Please let me know if you have any objection to it, otherwise I will=20
> check it in.
>=20

Thanks, it looks great!  But better pass this through davidch@, as he
might have objections regarding this modification.  My first intention
was to enable the header splitting by default, but he seemed to have some
concerns, so the compile-time option was a kind of consensus.

--=20
Stanislav Sedov
ST4096-RIPE

--Signature=_Mon__30_Nov_2009_20_48_44_-0800_TBpGg.ujfEwuWyU8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=0Gwv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Mon__30_Nov_2009_20_48_44_-0800_TBpGg.ujfEwuWyU8--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091130204844.9bec6460.stas>