Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 03 Feb 2016 02:34:43 +0100
From:      "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
To:        fs@freebsd.org
Cc:        "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Subject:   fsck on current not always prompting a 2nd run when it should
Message-ID:  <201602030134.u131YhTn084882@fire.js.berklix.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi fs@ people
fsck is sometimes (not always) not prompting for a 2nd run of fsck
when FS is still bad.  (After a few crashes I've become cautious
enough to give it a 2nd run even after it first detects no errors
left to fix.  There's a bug in fsck somewhere, it should ask for a
re-run more than it does.

fsck running on uname -a
  FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #12182:
  Mon Oct 19 23:57:08 CEST 2015
  jhs@lapr.js.berklix.net:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/LAPR.small  amd64

Background:
   partition was corrupted running 10.2-RELEASE, but fsck is running on current.
  
   On 10.2-RELEASE I've been doing intensive IO for days, 
   cd /usr/ports  ; make reinstall-recursive
  	# http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/ports/gen/Mk/
   with a selection of */Makefile.inc that result in my 1000+ favourites
   being shown by
  	pkg info | wc -l
   This has repeatedly reinstalled some common dependency ports/, hence heavy IO.
   + rdist mirroring,
   + devd usb ufs stick mounts, mdconfig, gbde, shells to umount & 
   maybe mdconfig -u after.
   Plenty of activity might have caused the corruption, but ...

I'm not querying corruption on 10.2-RELEASE I'm just concerned fsck on
current fails to tell me to re-run fsck.
  
I didnt save previous fsck reports, but have this one.
Current fstab:
	/dev/ada0s4f   /data   ufs  rw,noauto    1  5

rc.conf:	background_fsck="NO"

dumpfs -m /dev/ada0s4f
newfs -O 2 -U -a 4 -b 32768 -d 32768 -e 4096 -f 4096 -g 16384 -h 64 -i 8192 -j -k 6408 -m 8 -o time -s 1793576920 /dev/ada0s4f 

fsck -y /data
	** /dev/ada0s4f
	
	USE JOURNAL? yes
	
	** SU+J Recovering /dev/ada0s4f
	** Reading 33554432 byte journal from inode 70.
	
	RECOVER? yes
	
	** Building recovery table.
	** Resolving unreferenced inode list.
	** Processing journal entries.
	
	WRITE CHANGES? yes
	
	** 1974 journal records in 105472 bytes for 59.89% utilization
	** Freed 0 inodes (0 dirs) 0 blocks, and 0 frags.
	
	***** FILE SYSTEM MARKED CLEAN *****
That ran very suspiciously quickly, so I ran it again, 
took a long time (as about 900 gig)

fsck -y /data
	** /dev/ada0s4f
	
	USE JOURNAL? yes
	
	** SU+J Recovering /dev/ada0s4f
	Journal timestamp does not match fs mount time
	** Skipping journal, falling through to full fsck
	
	** Last Mounted on /s4/data
	** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
	** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
	UNALLOCATED  I=19604676  OWNER=root MODE=0
	SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb  3 00:52 2016 
	NAME=/release/10.2-RELEASE/usr/ports/x11/pixman/work/.PLIST.setuid
	
	UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY
	
	REMOVE? yes
	
	UNALLOCATED  I=19604677  OWNER=root MODE=0
	SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb  3 00:52 2016 
	NAME=/release/10.2-RELEASE/usr/ports/x11/pixman/work/.PLIST.writable
	
	UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY
	
	REMOVE? yes
	
	UNALLOCATED  I=19604678  OWNER=root MODE=0
	SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb  3 00:52 2016 
	NAME=/release/10.2-RELEASE/usr/ports/x11/pixman/work/.PLIST.objdump
	
	UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY
	
	REMOVE? yes
	
	UNALLOCATED  I=19604679  OWNER=root MODE=0
	SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb  3 00:40 2016 
	NAME=/release/10.2-RELEASE/usr/ports/x11/pixman/work/.install_done.pixman._usr_local
	
	UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY
	
	REMOVE? yes
	** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
	** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
	** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
	FREE BLK COUNT(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK
	SALVAGE? yes
	
	SUMMARY INFORMATION BAD
	SALVAGE? yes
	
	BLK(S) MISSING IN BIT MAPS
	SALVAGE? yes
	
	10707223 files, 158068913 used, 59088404 free (1210332 frags, 7234759 blocks, 0.6% fragmentation)
	
	***** FILE SYSTEM MARKED DIRTY *****
	
	***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
	
	***** PLEASE RERUN FSCK *****

fsck -y /data
	** /dev/ada0s4f
	
	USE JOURNAL? yes
	
	** SU+J Recovering /dev/ada0s4f
	Journal timestamp does not match fs mount time
	** Skipping journal, falling through to full fsck
	
	** Last Mounted on /s4/data
	** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
	** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
	** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
	** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
	** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
	** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
	10707223 files, 158068913 used, 59088404 free (1210332 frags, 7234759 blocks, 0.6% fragmentation)
	
	***** FILE SYSTEM MARKED CLEAN *****
	
	***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey,  BSD Linux Unix Sys. Eng. Consultant Munich http://berklix.eu
 Mail plain text,  No quoted-printable, HTML, base64, MS.doc.
 Prefix old lines '> '  Reply below old, like play script.  Break lines by 80.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201602030134.u131YhTn084882>