Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:55:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@webgiro.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: Boris Popov <bp@butya.kz>, Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Conditionally removing cosmetic messages for small kernels (PICOBSD). Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0007180955160.95031-100000@mx.webgiro.com> In-Reply-To: <20000717181754.A13979@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Boris Popov <bp@butya.kz> [000717 17:07] wrote: > > > > A more general question: should we allow more options to exclude > > optional and obsolete parts of the kernel ? For example, I've ripped out > > aout, aio and jail related code without any effect on functionality for my > > particular system. > > I'm sure our friends in the embedded systems world would say yes. :) For well-known set of applications you may want also to remove COMPAT_43. Andrzej Bialecki // <abial@webgiro.com> WebGiro AB, Sweden (http://www.webgiro.com) // ------------------------------------------------------------------- // ------ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve. http://www.freebsd.org -------- // --- Small & Embedded FreeBSD: http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ ---- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.20.0007180955160.95031-100000>