Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:01:13 +0000 From: John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: threads@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Strawman proposal: making libthr default thread implementation? Message-ID: <20060703120113.GA24614@what-creek.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0607030744030.5823@sea.ntplx.net> References: <20060703101554.Q26325@fledge.watson.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0607030744030.5823@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 07:48:43AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > Yes, you have to support PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT, PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT > mutexes, and SCHED_RR, SCHED_FIFO, and SCHED_SPORADIC scheduling > (hopefully not under the restriction that you are a privileged user). How important are those relative to having libpthread work on other architectures? Are there any plans to get libpthread working on the other architectures? -- John Birrell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060703120113.GA24614>